White Fly Resistance in Cucumis Species

Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 1:38 (article 34) 1978

E. Kowalewski3 and R. W. Robinson
New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456

Cucumis species were evaluated for resistance to natural infestation with white flies in the greenhouse. Scanning electron and stereoscope microscope studies were made to determine if white fly resistance is related to morphology or density of leaf trichomes. White fly resistance was compared to cucurbitacin content as determined by ultraviolet fluorescence of chloroform leaf extracts treated with antimony trichloride.

The three species with the greatest density of trichomes, C. dinteriC. angolensis and C. asper, were the species most resistant to white flies (Table 1). Overall, trichome density was inversely correlated with frequency of adults (r = -.89), pupae (r = -.39), larvae (r = -.61), and eggs (r = -.53) of the white fly, but this relationship was not evident among species having trichomes spaced further apart than the size of the white flies. White fly resistance did not appear to be related to any morphological feature of the trichomes, and none of the species had glandular trichomes. No correlation was noted between cucurbitacin content and white fly infestation.

Table 1. Number of Trichomes and Different Stages of the White Fly on Leaves of Cucumis species.

Species

Trichomes¹

Eggs¹

Larvae¹

Pupae¹

Adults²

C. prophetarum 34 108 199 12 9.0
C. trigonus 24 175 236 148 9.0
C. sativus 33 151 177 168 8.8
C. heptadactylus 14 257 197 18 8.5
C. ficifolius 18 64 119 10 8.5
C. leptodermis 34 173 144 98 8.5
C. longipes 38 160 166 133 8.2
C. metuliferus 26 82 119 63 8.0
C. hookeri 40 102 144 72 8.0
C. dipsaceus 62 123 99 28 7 5
C. anguria 45 234 226 74 7.5
C. zeyheri 43 106 121 40 7.1
C. pustulatus 30 46 70 19 7.0
C. myriocarpus 32 52 36 35 6.5
C. africanus 52 107 103 38 5 8
C. melo 56 88 77 17 5.0
C. asper 110 44 44 2 2.0
C. angolensis 117 44 86 13 2.0
C. dinteri 200 12 4 0 1.5

¹ Mean number per unit area of lower leaf surface.
² Subjectively rated from 1 (resistant) to 9 (susceptible).